| Pittsburgh, PA Thursday January 8, 2009 |
| News Sports Lifestyle Classifieds About Us | |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
![]() 11: Sovereign immunity
Wednesday, November 27, 2002
11TH AMENDMENT (1795)
So infused with English common law was colonial-era jurisprudence, that understanding the Constitution is difficult without knowing its roots. So it was with the idea of "sovereign immunity" -- the concept that the government cannot be sued without its consent. But, just as the king, or sovereign, enjoyed a certain immunity, it presumed that he would do no wrong and would right any he might inadvertently commit.
Thus, in 1702, England's Chief Justice John Holt would write: "If the plaintiff has a right, he must of necessity have means of vindication if he is injured ... right and remedy, want of right and want of remedy, are reciprocal." In short: if the king had divine rights, he had hefty obligations to straighten things out when he erred. That thinking lay behind the passage of the 11th Amendment. This first change in the Constitution since the Bill of Rights was prompted by a case in Georgia, in which the Supreme Court ruled a foreigner could sue a state.
Amendment XI: The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state, or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.
|
|||||||||||
Back to top E-mail this story ![]() | ||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||